Adopt MCP servers at scale with Kubernetes

Tackle the full MCP lifecycle with infrastructure you trust

What can you do with Stacklok’s MCP runtime?

Let’s get a little more technical. Here’s what separates Stacklok’s MCP runtime from alternatives.

Alternatives: Most gateways and control planes don’t include a runtime at all; they are just a policy and visibility layers. 

Stacklok: We felt it was imperative that our platform have an integrated runtime. We understand that enterprises need to manage the MCP lifecycle with permission profiles, network isolation and more. 

Alternatives: Many MCP solutions either don’t leverage containers or wrap MCP servers in “generic Docker” which weakens security. 

Stacklok: Stacklok dynamically builds a container image for each MCP server, so you benefit from isolation and can enforce identity and access policy per request.

Alternatives: Most solutions require that your platform team build its own structure to manage a growing fleet of MCP servers. 

Stacklok: Stacklok’s runtime includes a registry server you can use for cluster-wide namespace scanning across multi-tenant Kubernetes deployments.

Alternatives: Other solutions built on Kubernetes use CRDs that the platform team understands, but that don’t scale to admins. 

Stacklok: We make it easy for platform teams to use Kubernetes patterns like CRDs, but also offer a database-backed system, so that admins can manage servers, skills and models without dependencies.

Want to talk through your options?

We’ll get you on a call with a technical expert. Schedule a time here.